Promotion and Tenure Information
The Promotion and Tenure process is an important element in the career of any faculty member. This information is intended to help faculty members, departments, and committees with the process.
Information on the new Electronic Submission Process for Retention, Tenure and Promotion Reviews can be found on the Provost’s website.
College Due Dates
|Due to Dept||Due to Dean||Due to Provost||Copy of Provost Recommendation sent to Faculty|
|Retention||See department||September 29||November 1||February 1|
|Tenure and Promotion||See department||October 30||December 15||March 30|
|Promotion only||See department||December 15||February 1||April 15|
Promotion and Tenure College Committee
|Bob Peterson||Elected Member, Chair||Land Resources & Environmental Sciences||3 years||2015||Summer 2018|
|Chris Stoddard||Appointed Alternate||Agricultural Economics & Economics||1 year||2017||Summer 2018|
|Mary Burrows||Elected Member||Plant Sciences & Plant Pathology||3 years||2016||Summer 2019|
|Jeff Mosley||Elected Member||Animal & Range Sciences||3 years||2017||Summer 2020|
|Carl Igo||Appointed Member||Agricultural Education||1 year||2017||Summer 2018|
The committee is composed of tenured faculty and must include at least a 25% female and/or minority representation. Three members of the College P&T Committee are elected by their peers for terms of three years.The Dean will appoint the fourth member and will also appoint as fifth member a departmentally-approved alternate from an academic unit not represented on the committee. Elected members may not serve consecutive terms, members cannot serve if being considered for promotion, and no member can serve on more than one P&T committee.
The College P&T Committee is charged with reviewing all submitted materials, providing any required materials, conducting a fair, objective, independent, and substantive review of the candidate's dossier based on department, college, and University criteria and standards and make recommendations regarding retention, tenure or promotion. The recommendation shall include a written rationale. If the intermediate review committee's recommendation does not concur with those of the primary review committee or the primary administrative reviewer, the committee's rationale must explain the point(s) of difference.
The intermediate review committee is also responsible for:
- Reviewing, making suggestions for modification, and approving the role and scope, criteria and standards documents of the departments,
- Conducting the election for faculty representatives to the college and UPT Committees, and
- Preparing a written recommendation, with vote tally, concerning the retention, tenure, and/or promotion of each candidate for review.